I'm going to steal the image from early yesterday morning. It's far less gloomy than the sunless gray of today. Being able to see the mountain ridges in the distance pulls me out of my little neighborhood.
I'm concerned that as a people we have lost most of our vision that lets us see beyond our own patches and interests. On top of that I'm not sure that we're willing to step up to the plate and address our own needs. This is where government should be helping. Yet the news isn't promising.
I read with interest the Washington Post article, "Stressing Pork, Not The Party," by E.J. Dionne.
What's interesting is the extent to which Allen and other Republican incumbents around the country are talking up how they brought big government's largess to their constituents.
It doesn't matter that they claim to be against that very same big government. Faced this year with a choice between running on their party's record and delivering pork, they'll take pork.
Now I don't think this is a purely Republican trend. In fact I think it reflects an attitude which society seems to have embraced. Current trends suggest we want to get as much out of government for our little patches as possible while paying in the absolute minimum amount.
In fact some people will tell you that would rather pay in nothing and get everything that they want.
I want to think that our schools are doing their job, and that the next generation realizes there is no free lunch. I don't care how many free services you find in the world, whether it is Gmail or Mapquest, somewhere someone is paying for this stuff. None of our government programs are free. Someone pays for them.
My kids went to Cave Spring High School in Roanoke, Va. I can still remember other areas of the county arguing that Cave Spring didn't deserve an athletic field of its own because it was in a rich area and had other advantages. Perhaps one of those other advantages happened to be the kids having to go outside to get to their classrooms on time because the hallways were so crowded.
We finally got a new high school when Hidden Valley High was built. Unfortunately my kids had graduated and all we got to show for it were higher taxes. We pay the bills because we hope that a good education is important for everyone even those that don't have their own athletic field or aren't our kids.
All of us in Southwest Virginia want Interstate 81 fixed, but no one is willing to pay for it either in the form of user based tolls or higher taxes.
You don't have to drive many super highways to figure out that Interstate 81 has a far higher percentage of trucks than either Interstate 40 in North Carolina or Interstate 66 in Northern Virginia.
I've heard all the truck lobby stuff about the high percentage of taxes that trucks pay, but clearly trucks which drive on Interstate 81 aren't paying more taxes than trucks which drive on Interstate 66. Yet those trucks on Interstate 81 make it one of the most nerve racking Interstates to drive in our area.
Maybe we just need to collect a special tax on trucks that want to use Interstate 81 and use that tax solely to improve that one highway.
Now there are lots of reasons why this may or may not work, but this is the kind of debate we should be having instead of Senators bragging about how much bacon they have brought home.
We need to focus more on how to pay for things we want instead of how to get things at the expense of some other state or county.
We don't have a purely democratic system of government. Our Senators are supposed to rise above the pettiness of politics and do what is right for the republic. Instead it is every Senator for himself with the hopes that they have brought home enough loot to achieve the one goal that they can all agree upon, re-election.
We don't really have problems that have no solutions. We have people governing who aren't interested in providing anything but distracting candy to a population which seems to have lost its collective will to demand more of those entrusted with providing leadership to our country.
We have millions of Americans without health care. Yet no one in government (except Massachusetts) seems to be interested in providing an option of health care coverage which is affordable. It can be done because the group of uncovered people is huge. What's wrong with the idea of a national health care program where people are guaranteed the ability to purchase insurance? Surely it makes more sense than the system we have now.
Yet is seems our politicians would far rather let the free market system cherry pick health care customers and let the ones who can't afford the higher rates just go without coverage. This is the exactly the kind of situation where government needs to provide a real solution.
I am no longer interested in bring home the bacon politics. I want real solutions to health care, roads, and retirement. I really don't care how much you got for your local pet project. I would like my politicians to focus on the real problems of the country, not just on how to get re-elected.
I would also like to see a few controls on a Presidency that seems more interested in changing the balance of power between our branches of government than in providing sustainable services to our population. I think the NY Times editorial, "Read the Fine Print," pretty well covers the president's power grab.
Over 212 years, 42 presidents issued “signing statements” objecting to a grand total of 600 provisions of new laws. George W. Bush has done that more than 800 times in just over five and a half years in office.
Somehow that seem a little out kilter to me.
I doubt the lapdog politicians will understand my view, which is that I'm not very interested in changing our form of government even if there are terrorists lurking in the woods.
Then again the view from the mountain is a little broader than the view from inside the beltway.